| Long Range Goal: All K-12 students will achieve at high levels in mathematics. | ||
| Annual goals 2005-2006 | ||
| Students in the Atlantic Community Schools will show improvement in mathematics as evidenced by at least one of the following indicators: | ||
| 1. The percent of 4th grade full academic year students scoring above the 40th NPR on the math total portion of the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills will increase from 78.43% proficient in accordance with the Iowa Accountability established trajectories in mathematics. | ||
| This indicator was not met in 4th grade. | ||
| In the fall of 2005, 69.2% of the FAY 4th graders were proficient on the ITBS mathematics total portion compared to 78.43% in the fall of 2004. | ||
| 2. The percent of 8th grade full academic year students scoring above the 40th NPR on the math total portion of the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills will increase from 68.6% proficient in accordance with the Iowa Accountability established trajectories in mathematics. | ||
| This indicator was met in 8th grade. | ||
| In the fall of 2005, 77.8% of the FAY 8th graders were proficient on the ITBS mathematics total portion compared to 68.6% in the fall of 2004. | ||
| 3. The percent of 11th grade full academic year students scoring above the 40th NPR on the Iowa Tests of Educational Development in quantitative thinking will increase from 83.04% proficient in accordance with the Iowa Accountability established trajectory in mathematics. | ||
| This indicator was not met in 11th grade. | ||
| In the fall of 2005, 77.3% of the FAY 11th graders were proficient on the ITED quantitative thinking compared to 83.04% in the fall of 2004. | ||
| 4. 6 out of 7 classes (3-9) will make at least a yearÕs growth (1.0 NGE) on the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills on the math total from the fall 2004 to fall 2005. | ||
| This indicator was met in grades 3-5 and 7-9. | ||
| 6 out of the 7 (3rd through 9th) classes made at least one yearÕs growth (1.0 NGE) on ITBS math total: 3rd graders, 1.3 yearÕs growth; 4th graders, 1.7 yearÕs growth; 5th graders, 1.2 yearÕs growth; 7th graders, 1.7 yearÕs growth; 8th graders, 1.5 yearÕs growth; and 9th graders, 2.7 yearÕs growth. | ||
| 5. 3 out of the 5 grades (1st through 5th) will increase their spring mean total from the year before on the math CBMÕs. | ||
| This indicator was not met in grades 1, 2, and 4. | ||
| 2 out of the 5 grades (1st through 5th) increased their spring mean total from the previous year. 3rd grade mean total went from 168 to 179 and 5th grade mean total from 167 to 206. 2nd grade mean total remained the same at 162. | ||
| 6. At least two grade levels 3-8 will make their expected RIT growth in mathematics from fall 2005 to spring 2006. | ||
| This indicator was met in all grades 3-8. | ||
| 6 out of 6 grades exceeded their mean growth target. Grade 3 mean RIT growth was 11.6 with a target of 10.5. Grade 4 mean RIT growth was 9.7 with a target of 8.5. Grade 5 mean RIT growth was 11.9 with a target of 8.4. Grade 6 mean RIT growth was 7.1 with a target of 7.0. Grade 7 mean RIT growth was 9.7 with a target of 6.0. Grade 8 mean RIT growth was 9.0 with a target of 4.9. | ||
| 7. Percentage of students (grades 3-8) who achieve expected (typical) growth on NWEA/MAP mathematics assessment from fall to spring will increase in 4 out of the 6 grade levels from the 2004-2005 testing. | ||
| This indicator was met in all grades 3-8. | ||
| The percentage of students achieving expected (typical) growth increased in all grades: 3rd from 32.3% meeting growth target in 2004-2005 to 59.2% in 2005-2006, 4th from 48.0% to 65.7%, 5th from 62.7% to 74.5%, 6th from 34.8% to 53.5%, 7th from 44.3 to 73.7% and 8th from 41.3% to 72.5%. | ||
| 8. More than 87% of 2005-2006 sophomores will score in the upper three quartiles nationally on the PLAN in mathematics. | ||
| This indicator was met in 10th grade.. | ||
| 94% of the 2005-2006 10th graders scored in the upper three quartiles nationally on the PLAN in mathematics compared to 87% the previous year. | ||