District-Wide Multiple Mathematics Assessment Data

CBM, NWEA, and ICAM

In grade span K-5

How did the fourth grade students perform on the district assessments in mathematics?

•On the CBM's the fourth graders improved their multipication, division, and mixed problems from fall to spring.

•The mean number correct in the fall of 2005 compared to spring 2006 showed 41 point, 26 point, and 22 point mean growth in multiplication, division, and mixed problems respectively.

•the mean number correct in the spring of 2006 was 165 cinoared ti sorubg 2005 number corect of 172. This was a mean decrease of 7.

CBM Math (mean) Achievement Results for Grades K-5
Math	Kindergarten		Grade 1	Grade 2	Grade 3	Grade 4	Grade 5
Probe Norms			66	98	125	115	129
1996-1997
1997-1998
1998-1999	39		80
1999-2000	40		77	86	140
2000-2001	40		82	105	143
2001-2002	40		91	100	162	160	172
2002-2003	40		83	116	137	152	189
2003-2004	41		89	124	171	142.94	187.35
2004-2005			87	162	168	172	167
2005-2006			80	162	179	165	206

 CBM Math (mean) Achievement Results for Grades 1-3 for Fall, Winter, and Spring 2005-2006

	+ fall	+ winter	+ spring	- fall	- winter	- spring	+/- fall	+/- winter	+/- spring	Mean of Total Correct
1st	5	19	33	2	10	22	3	12	25	80
	+	+	+	-	-	-	+ 1-2 digit	+ 1-2 digit	+ 1-2 digit	- 1-2 digit	- 1-2 digit	- 1-2 digit
	fall	winter	spring	fall	winter	spring	fall	winter	spring	fall	winter	spring
2nd	25	51	68	14	22	37	11	13	39	3	5	18	162
3rd	53	86	73	24	36	43	14	36	42	8	14	21	179

CBM Math (mean) Achievement Results for Grades 4-5 for Fall and Spring 2004-2005

	x fall	x spring	/ fall	/ spring	mixed fall	mixed spring	Mean Correct
4th	43	84	18	44	15	37	165
5th	79	108	41	56	25	42	206

 

In grade span 3-8

NWEA Math Fall to Spring RIT Comparison

NWEA (Northwest Evaluation Association) MATH ALT version

 

Math	2000 / 2001	Grade 3	Grade 4	Grade 5	Grade 6	Grade 7	Grade 8
Average Class RIT	Fall 2000	186.77	198.79	-	-	223.08	229.84
	Spring 2001	199.42	204.71	-	-	230.86	238.44
Class RIT Growth	F 00-S 01	12.65	5.92	-	-	7.78	8.60
Typical Growth	Fall - Spring	12.6	8.8	-	-	7.2	7.6

 

Math	2001 / 2002	Grade 3	Grade 4	Grade 5	Grade 6	Grade 7	Grade 8
Average Class RIT	Fall 2001	189.11	199.48	-	-	220.40	234.59
	Spring 2002	200.85	207.46	-	-	230.07	243.30
Class RIT Growth	F 01-S 02	11.74	7.98	-	-	9.67	8.71
Typical Growth	Fall - Spring	11.5	8.8	-	-	7.2	7.6

 

Math	2002 / 2003	Grade 3	Grade 4	Grade 5	Grade 6	Grade 7	Grade 8
Average Class RIT	Fall 2002	186.71	200.16	208.22	212.10	-	-
	Spring 2003	198.68	208.29	217.43	220.36	-	-
Class RIT Growth	F 02-S 03	11.97	8.13	9.21	8.26	-	-
Typical Growth	Fall - Spring	12.6	8.7	8.3	6.9	-	-

 

Math	2003 / 2004	Grade 3	Grade 4	Grade 5	Grade 6	Grade 7	Grade 8
Average Class RIT	Fall 2003	193.03	200.28	209.63	216.83	-	-
	Spring 2004	202.11	207.77	219.10	223.65	-	204.78
Class RIT Growth	F 03-S 04	9.08	6.49	9.47	6.62	-	-
Typical Growth	Fall - Spring	11.8	8.9	8.8	8.1	-	-

NWEA (Northwest Evaluation Association) Math MAP version

Math	2004 / 2005	Grade 3	Grade 4	Grade 5	Grade 6	Grade 7	Grade 8
Average Class RIT	Fall 2004	194.5	206.2	210.5	218.2	225.8	232.4
	Spring 2005	203.3	214.4	220.7	223.2	231.3	237.7
Class RIT Growth	F 04-S 05	8.8	8.2	10.2	5.0	5.5	5.3
Typical Growth	Fall - Spring	11.8	8.9	8.8	8.1	6.9	7.1

 

Math	2005 / 2006	Grade 3	Grade 4	Grade 5	Grade 6	Grade 7	Grade 8
Average Class RIT	Fall 2005	192.8	202.1	213.5	219.2	224.2	232.9
	Spring 2006	204.4	211.8	225.4	226.3	233.9	241.9
Class RIT Growth	F 05-S 06	11.6	9.7	11.9	7.1	9.7	9.0
Typical Growth	Fall - Spring	10.5	8.5	8.4	7.0	6.0	4.9

* The class average RIT growth exceeded the typical RIT growth in grades 3-8 for the first time.

NWEA Mathematics Growth Target

Number and % of Students Achieving Typical Growth

2004-2005
Grade	Number of Students	Percent of Students
3	32 out of 99	32.3%
4	49 out of 102	48.0%
5	64 out of 102	62.7%
6	39 out of 112	34.8%
7	51 out of 115	44.3%
8	50 out of 121	41.3%
9	32 out of 99	32.3%
2005-2006
3	61 out of 103	59.2%
4	67 out of 102	65.7%
5	79 out of 106	74.5%
6	54 out of 101	53.5%
7	84 out of 114	73.7%
8	79 out of 109	72.5%
*For the first time, over 50% of the students at each grade level met their individual growth target!

In grade span 9-12

How do the PLAN mathematics scores of Atlantic High School sophomores compare to the 10th grde students nationally?

•The Plan test is given to all Atlantic High School sophomores each year in October.

•The 136 sophomores in 2005-2006 had a mean score of 18.9 which was above the national mean of 16.3. The mean of 18.9 was an increase from 18.2 the previous year.

•the males ecored higher than the females. The males mean score was 19.5 comnpared to the female mean score of 18.3. This was an increase for both gender groups from the previous year.

•94% of the 2005-2006 sophomores scored in the upper three quartiles nationally in mathematics. This was an increase from 87% the previous year.

Nat'l Quartile	Score Range	% of AHS sophomores
		2002-2003	2003-2004	2004-2005	2005-2006
75-99%	19-32	48%	54%	48%	55%
50-74%	15-18	25%	25%	26%	21%
25-49%	13-14	17%	15%	13%	18%
1-24%	1-12	10%	7%	13%	6%

Is the academic achievement of AHS PLAN tested sophomores for the past 4 years improving in reading compared to that of sophomores nationally?

•  The AHS sophomores have consistently scored above the national average of 15.8 in mathematics.