District-Wide Multiple Mathematics Assessment Data

CBM, NWEA, and ICAM

 

District-Wide Multiple Mathematics Assessment Data
CBM, NWEA, and ICAM
In grade span K-5

How did the fourth grade students perform on the district assessments in mathematics?

 
¥On the CBMÕs the fourth graders improved their multiplication, division, and mixed problems from fall to spring.
¥The mean number correct in the spring of 2007 was 161 compared to the spring 2006 (165) and to spring 2005 (172). This indicates a mean decrease of  4 and 7 respectively.
¥The mean number correct in the fall of 2006 compared to spring 2006 showed 41 mean point growth, 23 (a decrease of 3Êmean points from 2005-2006) mean point growth, and 22 mean point growth in multiplication, division, and mixed problemsÊrespectively.

 

CBM Math (mean) Achievement Results for Grades K-5

Math

Kindergarten

Grade 1

Grade 2

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Probe Norms

 

66

98

125

115

129

1996-1997

 

 

 

 

 

139

198

1997-1998

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998-1999

39

 

80

 

 

 

 

1999-2000

40

 

77

86

140

 

 

2000-2001

40

 

82

105

143

 

 

2001-2002

40

 

91

100

162

160

172

2002-2003

40

 

83

116

137

152

189

2003-2004

41

 

89

124

171

142.94

187.35

Revised CBM Assessments

2004-2005

 

87

162

168

172

167

2005-2006

 

80

162

179

165

206

2006-2007

 

82

164

196

161

202

 

CBM Math (mean) Achievement Results for Grades 1-3 for Fall, Winter, and Spring 2006-2007

 

+

fall

+

winter

+

spring

-

fall

-

winter

-

spring

+/-

fall

+/-

winter

+/-

spring

           Mean of Total Correct     (+ - x)

1st

4

16

35

2

9

23

3

9

24

                                               82

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

+

+

+

-

-

-

+

1-2 digit

+

1-2 digit

+

1-2 digit

-

1-2

digit

-

1-2

digit

-

1-2

digit

 

fall

winter

spring

fall

winter

spring

fall

winter

spring

fall

winter

spring

 

2nd

18

77

65

8

15

41

8

24

37

2

6

21

164

3rd

51

78

78

23

37

49

17

31

44

7

16

25

196

 

CBM Math (mean) Achievement Results for Grades 4-5 for Fall and Spring 2006-2007

 

x

fall

x

spring

/

fall

/

spring

mixed

fall

mixed

spring

Mean

Correct

4th

40

81

18

41

17

39

161

5th

75

107

37

57

25

39

202

 

In grade span 3-8

NWEA Math
Fall to Spring RIT Comparisons

NWEA (Northwest Evaluation Association) Math ALT version

Math

2000 / 2001

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

Grade 7

Grade 8

Average Class RIT

Fall 2000

186.77

198.79

-

-

223.08

229.84

 

Spring 2001

199.42

204.71

-

-

230.86

238.44

Class RIT Growth

F 00-S 01

12.65

5.92

-

-

7.78

8.60

Typical Growth

Fall - Spring

12.6

8.8

-

-

7.2

7.6

Math

2001 / 2002

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

Grade 7

Grade 8

Average Class RIT

Fall 2001

189.11

199.48

-

-

220.40

234.59

 

Spring 2002

200.85

207.46

-

-

230.07

243.30

Class RIT Growth

F 01-S 02

11.74

7.98

-

-

9.67

8.71

Typical Growth

Fall - Spring

11.5

8.8

-

-

7.2

7.6

Math

2002 / 2003

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

Grade 7

Grade 8

Average Class RIT

Fall 2002

186.71

200.16

208.22

212.10

-

-

 

Spring 2003

198.68

208.29

217.43

220.36

-

-

Class RIT Growth

F 02-S 03

11.97

8.13

9.21

8.26

-

-

Typical Growth

Fall - Spring

12.6

8.7

8.3

6.9

-

-

Math

2003 / 2004

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

Grade 7

Grade 8

Average Class RIT

Fall 2003

193.03

200.28

209.63

216.83

-

-

 

Spring 2004

202.11

207.77

219.10

223.65

-

204.78

Class RIT Growth

F 03-S 04

9.08

6.49

9.47

6.62

-

-

Typical Growth

Fall - Spring

11.8

8.9

8.8

8.1

-

-

NWEA (Northwest Evaluation Association) Math MAP version

Math

2004 / 2005

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

Grade 7

Grade 8

Average Class RIT

Fall 2004

194.5

206.2

210.5

218.2

225.8

232.4

 

Spring 2005

203.3

214.4

220.7

223.2

231.3

237.7

Class RIT Growth

F 04-S 05

8.8

8.2

10.2

5.0

5.5

5.3

Typical Growth

Fall - Spring

11.8

8.9

8.8

8.1

6.9

7.1

Math

2005 / 2006

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

Grade 7

Grade 8

Average Class RIT

Fall 2005

192.8

202.1

213.5

219.2

224.2

232.9

 

Spring 2006

204.4

211.8

225.4

226.3

233.9

241.9

Class RIT Growth

F 05-S 06

11.6

9.7

11.9

7.1

9.7

9.0

Typical Growth

Fall - Spring

10.5

8.5

8.4

7.0

6.0

4.9

* The class average RIT growth exceeded the typical RIT growth in grades 3-8 for the first time.

 

Math

2006 / 2007

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

Grade 7

Grade 8

Average Class RIT

Fall 2006

194.2

203.3

211.6

222.1

224.9

232.8

 

Spring 2007

205.6

214.6

222.2

228.9

231.0

241.7

Class RIT Growth

F 06-S 07

11.4

11.3

10.6

6.8

6.1

8.9

Typical Growth

Fall - Spring

10.2

8.4

8.6

7.0

5.8

4.9

* 5 out of the 6 classes exceeded the typical RIT growth in grades 3-8.

 

NWEA Mathematics Growth Target
Number and % of Students Achieving Typical Growth

 

2004-2005

Grade

Number of Students

Percent of Students

3

32 out of 99

32.3%

4

49 out of 102

48.0%

5

64 out of 102

62.7%

6

39 out of 112

34.8%

7

51 out of 115

44.3%

8

50 out of 121

41.3%

9

32 out of 99

32.2%

 

2005-2006

Grade

Number of Students

Percent of Students

3

61 out of 103

59.2%

4

67 out of 102

65.7%

5

79 out of 106

74.5%

6

54 out of 101

53.5%

7

84 out of 114

73.7%

8

79 out of 109

72.5%

*For the first time, over 50% of the students at each grade level met their individual growth target!

 

2006-2007

Grade

Number of Students

Percent of Students

3

46 out of 72

63.9%

4

72 out of 103

69.9%

5

66 out of 101

65.3%

6

48 out of 103

46.6%

7

56 out of 102

54.9%

8

84 out of 111

75.7%

 

 

In grade span 9-12

How do the PLAN mathematics scores of Atlantic High School sophomores compare to the 10th grade students nationally?

¥ The PLAN test is given to all Atlantic High School sophomores each year in October.
¥ The 135 sophomores in 2006-2007 had a mean score of 17.9 that was above the national mean of 17.4.ÊThe mean of 17.9 was a decrease from 18.9 the previous year.
¥ 84% of the 2006-2007 sophomores scored in upper three quartiles in mathematics nationally.  This wasÊa decrease from 94% the previous year.
¥ Males scored higher than the females.  The males mean score was 18.6 compared to the female mean score of 17.2. This was a decrease for both gender groups from the previous year.

 

NatÕl Quartile

Score Range

%  of AHS sophomores

 

 

2002-2003

2003-2004

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

75-99%

19-32

48%

54%

48%

55%

25%

50-74%

15-18

25%

25%

26%

21%

37%

25-49%

13-14

17%

15%

13%

18%

22%

1-24%

1-12

10%

7%

13%

6%

16%

 

Is the academic achievement of AHS PLAN tested sophomores for the past 4 years improving mathematically compared to that of sophomores nationally?

¥ The AHS sophomores have consistently scored above the national average of 17.4 in mathematics.

 

 

 

# of students

Mean Score

Atlantic

2006-2007

(N=135)

17.9

Atlantic

2005-2006

(N=136)

18.9

Atlantic

2004-2005

(N=110)

18.2

Atlantic

2003-2004

(N=121)

19.3

Atlantic

2002-2003

(N=109)

18.0

Atlantic

2001-2002

(N=108)

17.1

Atlantic

2000-2001

(N=146)

17.3